i have a tendency to believe a multi million dollar R&D team over an unsubstantiated claim on a message board when debating a question of good and bad X pipes, in all due respect... and the team at MF has a practically limitless budget for testing... I saw their 35K sq foot test and build center personally... here is just one section of this huge facility - my truck on a lift -
and for the record, I asked the very question - why this X pipe, why not traditional style? (yes, they do sell both styles)... they used to offer the typical x pipe standard, and said the flow numbers on this new one was far greater, and then he went into some tirade about gas laws and fluid dynamics because gas is a fluid... after that I lost him... but essentially he told me than ran tests for months to try and design a better X pipe...
they have...
and the numbers proved that they have done so.
I would love to hear your rebuttal with facts of course... that way i can go back to magnaflow and tell them they are not making a "good" x-pipe... and that they should contact you, of course!
:lol: