Digital camera advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter 03marauder
  • Start date Start date
Nikon D70

I bought a Nikon D70 last year on the advise of my neighbor who is a professional photographer / retired state trooper that did lots of tricky undrcover picture taking.
I helped him shoot the contents of a house last week. He was using a Nikon D2X. I believe his camera is in the $6,000 dollar rage. My D70 is around $1,200. Our pictures were equal in quality.
The last camera I had was a cannon G2 that you see the picture on the back before you shoot. It had a huge lag time after you pressed the go button and would not lock onto anything that was moving. The D70 nails it every time.
 
I bought a D70 also and am completely satisfied with it. It replaced a Sony Mavica. With a 1GB flash card, picture quality set on normal, and file size set on small, the flash card will hold 2000 pics. Every bump up in either size or quality halves the capacity.
Eg: fine and small=1000 pics
fine and medium=500 pics
fine and large=250 pics
The main reason I bought the D70 though is that all my Nikon FG 35mm SLR lenses will work with this camera although manual focusing and settings are required.
 
Mongoose said:
The main reason I bought the D70 though is that all my Nikon FG 35mm SLR lenses will work with this camera although manual focusing and settings are required.
Click to expand...
Me too...but ever notice the pics sometimes need a little tweaking with software....and more so the older nikor lenses weren't built for the digital SLR so you lose MAJOR wide angle shots?

IE: The older 35mm lenses attached to the D70 actually give you more like a 44mm view. Makes for a real PITA to take pics in a tight room.

I recently gave up out of frustration and not only skipped purchasing the stock D70 18-70mm lense and went with the tamaron 18-200. The beauty part...same price for both, but the zoom on the tamaron is awesome.

Next on the list...tamaron 1000mm ....can you say zoom a 1/2 mile....:woohoo:

BTW: I shoot large fine every time. I do so to enable further zoom on any object within the original shot with software, and the tiny object brought forward and cropped is clear as a bell. I get 279 shot on a 1gb card.

Here is an example of max distance and clarity after zoom. I took this shot with the D70 AT 200mm from nearly 200 feet away. If one plans on using their camera for anything other than a shot from say a maximum 35 feet....a DSLR is the way to go.

disney8_018.jpg


Same position at 50mm:

disney8_019.jpg
 
Last edited:
I bought my current camera like I buy my computer equip. Just pick what you're willing to spend and find the most camera for your money.
Things I've learned-
Digital zoom means nothing. 3.2 MP is good enough; anything better is a bonus.
ex: my cam is 4 megapixel. When I 1st got it I took a picture from across the room. Used the 'fine' quality setting (I can only guess you can pick how many pixels/inch I want based on how much storage I have on my camera. At fine, i'm guessing using 4megapixel, I took a picture of a water bottle. Using MS Paint I zoomed in and I could almost read the nutrition info on it. That's 4megapixels. I can't imagine not needing more.
A good photographer doesn't use zoom(esp. when using a camcorder!). Unless you're going to snipe someone 3x optical is good.
ex: Mine is 3x optical. It's good enough if I want to zoom in a little. If I were a secret agent I'd definitely get 7-10x optical. Someone at work took a pic of the skyline out of our office w/ a 7x optical and we zoomed in w/ the viewfinder on his camera and we could see people in cars from about 1/2 a mile I'm guessing.

Other than that- I price shop online, then I check places like ebay, then www.dealcase.com or gotapex.com, look for stores w/ coupon code options on their shopping cart or even allow stackable coupons (like Dell)
the great thing about places like dealcase and gotapex is they'll walk you through a site and what to click on to get you the best deal (click on for educational purposes, select these options, and enter these codes in this order... you get the idea)
 
Megapixel increase is very noticable if you plan to PRINT your pics on high quality photographic paper. There is no arguing that if PRINTING your shots is something you want to do...the lower the mp the grainier the shot is going to appear on paper.

I lowered the res of all of my some 700+ shots from Disney to 1024x768 to save image load time, and figured they would print fine as they look great. The two above are 1024x768. My wife showed me the difference between those, and the ones I saved at 6.3 mp 3008x2000, and hands down, the hi res pics in fine mode appeared better than any film shots, and 4 times as sharp as the low res.

On a computer all formats appear nice. On paper the truth comes out.

As far as zoom, a good photog does indeed use zoom! Not all picture are taken 15' from the subject. Those guys on the sidelines at sports events aren't using Tamaron 1000's just for grins. Otherwise you'd never see those choice closeups on the cover of Sports Illustrated.
 
Last edited:
I do agree w/ Cruz. Some professions do make use of zoom.
3-4 megapixel prints still look the same as non-digital camera prints in clarity. Obviously if you compare a 3 MP camera shot to a 6+ MP camera shot there would be a difference.
If I was budgeting for a 500 dollar purchase I'd definitely go with MegaPixels and sniper-like zoom.

Then again, I'm not this guy http://www.tawbaware.com/maxlyons/gigapixel.htm
 
Last edited:
Link worked for me Mary....and good thing for you...cause that guy is just plain Mega pixel CRAZY!!!!


WOW!!! :eek:

He shows a great example of what a 3mp camera WON'T capture however.
 
You are both right. jawz was talking about "digital zoom" and it indeed means nothing. It is a marketing spin that should basically be ignored. It is like an image crop followed by a resolution enhancement algorithm that results in fuzzy, interpolated images, made worse as you increase the "digital zoom" factor. "Optical zoom" is the only zoom value matters.

CRUZTAKER said:
As far as zoom, a good photog does indeed use zoom! ...
Click to expand...

jawz101 said:
Digital zoom means nothing.
Click to expand...
 
CRUZTAKER said:
Link worked for me Mary....and good thing for you...cause that guy is just plain Mega pixel CRAZY!!!!


WOW!!! :eek:

He shows a great example of what a 3mp camera WON'T capture however.
Click to expand...
The site must have been down. I'm going to bookmark that link.
 
you're forgetting the most important part of digital photography... Photoshop!

Gotta get Photoshop or some other really good image editing software to tweak the photos.

I use Photoshop and Illustrator nearly every week for 5 years - took me two years just to figure out how to work well with it and another 2 years to become skilled at using it. I am not talking about simple things like cropping, color balance, and shadows, fixing a red eye, removing a background, but much more complex things.

there are lots of decents cameras out there but if you can manipulate the images well then you got squat.

Incidently, I created my little Slowpoke graphic for my signature in about one minute using PhotoShop.
 
A word about zooming, if I may. For me, a decent zoom range is important. (My SLR zoom ranges is 28mm-200mm using various lenses.) Yes, you can crop the crap out of a picture using Photoshop. But why not compose it properly when you take the picture? Sometimes you're prevented from getting close enough to your subject but having a decent zoom rectifies that problem. I guess that's the difference between a snapshot and a photograph - composition. I have over 25 years of professional experience too.
 
Yeah I'm really late....

James uses a Nikon D70 with three Nikkor lenses. A 18-70 that's broken (just stuck in one place) a 28-200 (I love it, it was $400) and a 60mm macro.

James also wishes he had a real version of photoshop.

If you're looking at a Nikon D70 also check out the Cannon 20D. I like my camera, but that's competition and you can compare to see what fits your needs best.
 
03marauder said:
Ok, I'm looking for some advice/help with digital cameras here. I'm not a big camera person, but I'm looking at picking up a digital camera in the near future. Need something to take some good pictures with at Marauderville. So I don't know a whole lot when it comes to the subject, and I'm looking for something in the more affordable range. What is a good brand to go with? What kind of features should I look for? What do I need to get the pics to the computer? We have one here at work with a floppy for storage, but it is an older camera, nothing like the newer ones that I see out. I figure I would ask for advice here before talking to a salesman at the store who is just looking to sell whatever. Thanks for the help.
Click to expand...
The best camera is the name brand of your chioce with the highest "OPTICAL ZOOM" that you can afford and around 3 mpixels should do for any casual photos. The optical zoom gets you the clear photos, digital zoom starts to pixelate the picture grainey look. Most newer cameras only need a USB port to connect to your PC and if you have Windows XP it has a transfer utility built in, other wise the camera will come with the appropriate software and drivers.:beer:
 
If you wonder how shutterbugs get those sideline shots ... wonder no more!

Just thought I'd post a link to this great sports photo journalism site. It's patronized by most of the serious (re: good) professional photographers and by every wanna-be sports photographer.

SportsShooter.com

The shots are simply amazing and the discussions on photo techniques, camera features and related topics are pretty interesting, even to a "regular" photo monkey. (Just don't ask me to explain chimping to you.)

I agree with most of the stuff people have said on here and only have a few morsels of info to add. I've been shooting breaking news and sports for nearly 15 years. I'm a semi-pro shooter and also sold digital cameras at CompUSA between newspaper jobs.

Mega-pixels are important, but anything over 4 MP isn't really needed unless you intend to print the pictures larger than 8x10 or 'blow-up' a postage stamp-size portion of an image to full page.

If you're taking stuff you really want to keep, then make sure your camera shoots in RAW image files, as well as in JPEG formats. The RAW image is "EXACTLY" what the camera's sensor saw when you snapped the picture. JPEGs are compressed files, even after a few times of opening, editing and saving ... you will notice a difference in quality from the original RAW file as JPEG processing always throws away pieces of the picture to save file space. The more you edit/save a file ... the more of your original photo is being degraded and lost forever.

SLRs are definitely better as an investment than a "point&shoot", if only that you can become a better photographer and use more of their capabilities with new equipment (better or longer lens, faster zooms, remote flashes, etc.) You will be limited to whatever abilities the point-n-shoot has "built-in."

My biggest problem with point-n-shoot cameras is the delay from shutter press to image is taken. Like TAF said, it will work for a snapshot of a non-moving object if it is within 25 feet in daylight. If you want any thing else, get an SLR camera.

Digital Zoom is an illusion created by marketing stooges. The camera simply crops your photo and blows it up bigger, which is definitely not better in this case. You can do the same thing and better with any photo editing program. Stick to "Optical Zoom" or buy a better camera if you want to shoot things that are far away.

Personally, I have a Canon Digital Rebel EOS. Low-end of SLRs at just under $1,000, but it has all the capabilities of the same cameras used by true professionals. (6 mega-pixels, white-balance, fully programable, ISO (film speed) from 100 up to 1600, able to swap in any EOS-compatible lens for zooms, wide-angles, telephotos.

Buy a pair of memory cards that are as large as you can afford, you will likely use them. (I have a 1gig compact flash set) And after you download your photos, always FORMAT your media cards ... this is vital because otherwise you WILL get corrupted images at some point. A quick format or just erasing photos with the camera is not enough ... you don't want to lose that one unreproducable photo to digital gremlins.

Jeremy
Mad1
 
Mad1 said:
And after you download your photos, always FORMAT your media cards ... this is vital because otherwise you WILL get corrupted images at some point. A quick format or just erasing photos with the camera is not enough ... you don't want to lose that one unreproducable photo to digital gremlins.

Jeremy
Mad1
Click to expand...
Good advice, Jeremy. Hadn't thought about it before. Just like defragging......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top