Turbocharged Coyote/6R80 Swap, Build/Discussion Thread, Pics, info inside!

MOTOWN said:
This is an excellent transmission , but people need to realize by the time you buy the control unit, transmission, torque converter, drive shaft your looking at 5K or more.
Click to expand...

Not so bad......built 4R75W will run 3K or more easily and a 6R680 in stock forum in my buddies 2011 GT car is all stock with 922 RWHP!

You get better gear multiplication, you can now go WOT in higher gears unlike the 4R75W which will only go WOT to thrid gear, now you can drop the rear gear back down to a 3:55.

WIN WIN to me.
 
hotford said:
Not so bad......built 4R75W will run 3K or more easily and a 6R680 in stock forum in my buddies 2011 GT car is all stock with 922 RWHP!

You get better gear multiplication, you can now go WOT in higher gears unlike the 4R75W which will only go WOT to thrid gear, now you can drop the rear gear back down to a 3:55.

WIN WIN to me.
Click to expand...

I Agree.

$1200 for controller.
850ish for driveshaft.
$550-1100 for a 6R80 (F150 version) (if you pay more you aren't looking hard enough)
maybe $300 in miscellaneous parts.
The converter isn't needed right away either especially if you have a PD blower.
and you put it in yourself?

Money well spent knowing you have 2 more gears a trans that can damn near take on anything you can throw at it in its stock form and the pluses that Hotford mentioned. This has potential to be best mod dollar wise for anyone with a ford who doesn't have a 6R80 I think. Ford outdid themselves with this trans that is for sure.
 
hotford said:
Not so bad......built 4R75W will run 3K or more easily and a 6R680 in stock forum in my buddies 2011 GT car is all stock with 922 RWHP!

You get better gear multiplication, you can now go WOT in higher gears unlike the 4R75W which will only go WOT to thrid gear, now you can drop the rear gear back down to a 3:55.

WIN WIN to me.
Click to expand...

For the most part I agree with your comments except there is no reason or benefit to go wot past 3rd gear which is a 1:1 ratio anything beyond 3rd gear is pointless as there overdriven gears.
 
MOTOWN said:
For the most part I agree with your comments except there is no reason or benefit to go wot past 3rd gear which is a 1:1 ratio anything beyond 3rd gear is pointless as there overdriven gears.
Click to expand...

4R75W 1ST-2.84 2nd 1.55 3rd 1.0, 4th 0.70

6R680 1st 4.17 2nd 2.35 3rd 1.52 4th 1.14 5th 0.87 6th0.69




When your in a HWY pull against a Hell kitty and you can only top out around 140 ish with the 4r75w...the extra gear ratio is a bouns....
 
I REALLY want to Eco-Boost 3.5L swap whatever comes next.

I'm thinking a 10R80/Eco would be tits. Considering my '15 5400 lb Crew Cab 4x4's performance tune-only (6-speed auto still).

This is with an out-of-the-box tune, which appears to be very safe by the data/boost level's I am seeing:

20160902_235146_zpsksfqdlu9.jpg


Just the numbers from this setup alone in a lighter vehicle would be impressive, and that's all stock less tune. 3.31 gears/20" wheels and all. The little 6 bangers are very impressive.
 
I hear that. My wife's non eco 3.5 in her '13 EDGE is stupid quick!


Sent from my iThrone using Tapatalk
 
I'm currently running a hybrid of my own tuning blend, however that slip was with SSI's 93 Octane Level 2 tune. They now have about 4 revisions better i'm told, but never went any further as I ran out of time last season with the track closing for the end of year.

I also have Unleashed Performance tunes for it. All seem to perform very well, with each it's own style of pedal feel.
 
The Torque is unreal on these little guys. That's a 1.7 60'.......on a 5400 lb 4x4 Crew Cab with 3.31 ratio and 20" wheels.

That's faster than most modified race cars achieve, with a lot more weight.

They claim 600+ FT/LB at the rear wheel on this tune, a shade over 400 HP.
 
Put that tune into a Ford F-150 Tremor regular cab with the factory 4:11 gear and it might run in the 12s.
 
96gt4.6 said:
The Torque is unreal on these little guys. That's a 1.7 60'.......on a 5400 lb 4x4 Crew Cab with 3.31 ratio and 20" wheels.

That's faster than most modified race cars achieve, with a lot more weight.

They claim 600+ FT/LB at the rear wheel on this tune, a shade over 400 HP.
Click to expand...



That's insane!


Sent from my iThrone using Tapatalk
 
Fastbob said:
Put that tune into a Ford F-150 Tremor regular cab with the factory 4:11 gear and it might run in the 12s.
Click to expand...

12's is very doable on these from what I have seen, but never done personally. This is on Race Gas and the supporting tune. Same pickup as mine less 3.55's:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6_dhY92wb0

The problem with Eco is really once you turn up the boost, and get good fuel in them, you are limited by the turbo size and high pressure pump system from making more power, and they are quite expensive to mod from there. But, at close to 450ish RWHP and 650+ TQ like this truck would need to get those numbers, that's pretty impressive for sure....
 
hotford said:
4R75W 1ST-2.84 2nd 1.55 3rd 1.0, 4th 0.70

6R680 1st 4.17 2nd 2.35 3rd 1.52 4th 1.14 5th 0.87 6th0.69




When your in a HWY pull against a Hell kitty and you can only top out around 140 ish with the 4r75w...the extra gear ratio is a bouns....
Click to expand...

Wow! That would be a heck of a swap even for a slightly modded car (non-boosted)! If the car to be modded had 4.10's+, then it would be a tire killer! :drive::burn::burnout:
 
BLACKMAGIC03 said:
Wow I need to get one on mine....I just have warranty and kinda don't want to ruin it... But then again I like power lol
Click to expand...

I bought an '11 3.5 EB F150 that I then tuned ... stupid quick, but was returned due to electrical issues.

Now have a '15 3.5 EB. I want to tune it ... but it came with a 125K bumper to bumper warranty and a 100K maintenance plan thrown in ... if I can keep the mod bug away. I have had it for a little over 8 months and it currently has just shy of 17K miles. At the current rate, I will need to not mod the truck for 4.5 years ... ugh.

I have not taken it to the track either ... do not want to find out that officially it is faster than the Marauder. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top