CRUZTAKER
Found what I'm looking for...
Just for the record:
My (NON-stock displacement) 5.0 runs 12.9s with 3.55 gears.
I've run multiple 12s* in cool weather with 16" Drag radials giving me an effective rear ratio of 3.89. (*with No weight reductions)
If I had 4.10 gears and the 16" Drag Radials I would have been even deeper into the 12s.
I am running a less than perfect 93 octane tune and I am shifting at 6100 rpm.
In regards to the HP needed to run 12s in a Marauder: I am putting down 325 RWHP/340RWTQ.
That having been said....I think that a 4.6 prepped and modded the way Vortech347 outlined could crack the 12s.
Again, you are going to need some serious RPM and gears.
Thank you.
Some one with some REAL credibility adding 2c. :bows:
Where's Zack when we need him...doh...that's right...:shake:
Barry, Do you know what your 60 ft times were when you ran those 13.2s?
I'd like to compare them to my 60 ft times (run with 16" BFG Drag Radials) and see what the difference might have been...
1.69 IN THE HOUSE!
Just STFU, you dont know what the hell you are talking about. ....
Damnit you defeated the ignore list purpose in life again.
Just ignore the boy looking for an apartment and a garage big enough to house "looking at a boat" already.
Does anyone else see the trend here?
It's the Trilogy blown owners that are in denial here.
We the former faster NA owners turned forced induction vortech are believers...it's the throw down 6k on 16% credit line to run high 12's guys that are in denial. :baaa:
VORTECH: Affordible enough to pay cash...and STILL run 12's.
Last edited: